Sometimes a couple can obtain a divorce in more than one country. In
that case one such country may be more favourable to one party than
the other and so the question of where the divorce takes place can be
a significant issue.
Obviously, for a couple who were married in the UK and who have lived
all their lives here this sort of question does not usually arise. However,
it is inreasingly common for people from different countries and backgrounds
to marry and also for British people to spend much of their working
lives in other countries. Either of these situations and others can
lead to a choice of jurisdiction for divorce.
One common situation that arises, for example, is the case of a dispute
over child custody where one or both parents originate from muslim countries.
It often comes as a shock to a muslim father to discover that in the
UK it is normally the mother who has custody of children. In many muslim
countries that is not the case and so if the divorce could take place
in such a country instead of the UK it would have a very marked effect
on the outcome so far as the custody or residence of children was concerned.
Similarly, the UK does not in general recognise pre-nuptial
agreements whereas various other countries do. Obviously it might
suit one spouse to have the case heard in a country which does recognise
pre-nuptial agreements where one had been drawn up.
It is therefore of more than academic interest when there is a real
choice of jurisdiction. The different approaches in those different
jurisdictions might have a very real effect on the outcome. Say, for
instance, a married American couple have been living in the UK for over
a year and the husband issues a divorce petition here. He is entitled
to to that because he has been resident here for at least one year immediately
preceding the filing of the divorce petition and it does not matter
that they are both American and may have been married in the Unites
States or anywhere outside the UK.
The wife then returns to the US before divorce proceedings have been
concluded here. She in turn issues a divorce petition in the US. She
is almost certainly entitled to to that on the basis of her American
domicile although, of course, that sort of question will depend on the
local law of the jurisdiction. There are now two divorce petitions legitimately
issued and the English courts have to decide which of them should proceed.
There are in fact rules about how cases such as this should be decided.
If the wife in the above example wanted the proceedings to be heard
and determined in the US (because, for instance, she wanted a pre-nptial
agreement enforced) then she would have to apply to the English divorce
court to have the husband's divorce petition "stayed". If
she were successful in such an application then the husband would be
prevented from proceeding with the divorce in England and the US courts
would deal with the divorce.
The English courts decide questions such as these on a test which is
best decribed as the "balance of convenience". In this example,
one of the factors that would obviously weigh with the court would be
that both parties were American. It might be rather different if one
spouse were English and the other American as might easily be the case.
The court would also be influenced by how long the couple had lived
in England, where the bulk of their property was, whether there were
any children and, if so, where they were. All of these factors and others
would come into play. After weighing them up the court would then decide
whether it was better for the divorce to proceed in England or the US.
These are the sort of factors that are taken into account when there
is a conflict of jurisdiction. There is no mechanical answer. Each case
depends on its own facts.
However, where this sort of situation arises and there is the possibility
of a divorce taking place in more than one country it is worth considering
which jurisdiction is more favourable. Sometimes this can be of benefit
to both spouses. In the Philippines, for example, no divorce is permitted
because it is a staunchly Catholic country. Therefore an English man
married to a Filipino lady and living in the Philippines would not be
able to get a divorce there. However, either of them might be able to
get a divorce in England provided the English husband has still retained
his English domicile (as it often the case). If the marriage has broken
down beyond repair this solution might suit both spouses and it offers
a solution where otherwise there would not be one.
Please contact David
Terry at David_Terry@dterry.demon.co.uk if you need specific advice
or further information. This type of situation is in fact quite common
but since individual circumstances vary enormously such situations do
usually need advice tailored to the exact circumstances.