Divorce in England & Wales is currently granted on the basis
of the irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The Family Law Act 1996
which was passed by Parliament would have amended the law in quite significant
ways but it now appears that many of its provisions may never be brought
into effect. There are currently five so-called "grounds"
which can be relied upon as evidence of irretrievable breakdown:-
Adultery
Unreasonable
behaviour
Desertion
Two
years' separation with consent
Five
years' separation without consent
Although divorces based on the last three grounds are by no means uncommon,
in practice most divorces are based either on unreasonable behaviour
or adultery. The reason for this is that neither of these two grounds
involve the wait which the other grounds involve. When a marriage breaks
down it is not usually too difficult to find some instances of unreasonable
behaviour on either or both sides and so this is, not unnaturally, seen
as a route to a quick divorce. Once at least one spouse has become convinced
there is no future to the mariage he/she usually prefers to end it sooner
rather than later. Indeed, there are good reasons not to delay.
One very common reaction when, say, a husband receives a divorce petition
based on unreasonable behaviour is something along the lines of, "Why,
you've been quite as unreasonable as me and so I'm going to defend it
and issue my own petition." It is important to understand that
the reason for the divorce has, in the overwhelming majority of cases,
no impact whatever on the other two issues which may need to be resolved
- the questions of financial provision and/or any disputes affecting
residence or contact with the children. These two latter issues are
quite separate and dealt with completely independently of the divorce
and using quite different criteria.
Once this has been explained it is normally possible to allow a divorce
to proceed without acrimony and neither party need ordinarily attend
court. It is, however, often a tricky issue to handle at the outset
and, although it is perfectly possible to have an "amicable"
divorce and very many people do so each year, the way it is dealt with
in the initial stages can have a major impact on what happens later.
Unfortunately, there are a number of matters on a divorce
petition whose meaning is not immediately obvious to a lay person
and these technicalities often cause difficulties where there need not
be any. Indeed, it is very often the receipt of the divorce petition
and the "Acknowledgment of Service"
which prompts a client to consult a solicitor for the first time about
a divorce.
In point of fact it is very rarely possible to defend a divorce for
two main reasons. Firstly, the very fact that one party to the marriage
has presented a divorce petition is a fairly clear indicator of a serious
breakdown in the relationship. Secondly, Legal
Aid is very rarely available to defend a divorce mainly for the
reason given above. Although divorce petitions can be contested that
is uncommon and most solicitors would only recommend such a course if
there was some clear advantage to be gained by doing so. Such cases
are rare although very occasionally there are good reasons to file a
cross petition.
There are, however, other issues which very
often depend upon divorce and most people contemplating issuing a divorce
petition or who have received one should very likely take legal advice
so that they fully understand the position and the issues involved.
The one which causes the greatest number of disputes is almost certainly
what is called "ancillary relief"
- ie resolving the financial issues between the parties. There are also
specific issues about divorce of concern to
men in particular to which great attention needs to be paid if the
husband is not to come out of the process feeling aggrieved and regarding
himself as the victim of injustice. And, of course, most people want
to know that the costs of a divorce and the
time scale are. This latter point can be especially important if
one of the parties wishes to remarry. Finally, there is the remote possibility
that a decree of judicial separation might
be more appropriate than a divorce but one should reflect very carefully
indeed if one is ever presented with this latter option. Frequently
it is suggested but it is rarely appropriate.
Please contact David
Terry at David_Terry@dterry.demon.co.uk if you need specific advice
or further information.