How and how much solicitors charge for their services in the UK is
not well understood by their clients although the Law Society of England
& Wales does have clear rules about how it should be done. One common
misconception, for instance, is that solicitors hold on to clients'
money for as long as possible in order to earn (and keep) the interest
on that money. In fact, this does not happen (unless it has been expressly
agreed in advance with the client) because interest on clients' money
belongs to the client as much as the money itself. The Law Society has
strict rules about it and every solicitor is aware of them. Nevertheless,
the fact that this notion is so widespread amongst the public is an
indication of how bad solicitors sometimes are at explaining their charges
to clients.
It has to be said that solicitors are often their own worst enemy in
this respect because the subject of solicitors' charges in England (which
they refer to by the arcane word "costs") is bedevilled by
the use of unnecessarily complicated words and charging methods. This
is a pity because the actual rules which govern solicitors' charges
to their clients are designed to be fair and transparent. For instance,
secret commissions, which are commonplace in some professions and of
which the client is absolutely unaware, are not permitted to solicitors
and all charges and commissions received from third parties must be
fully disclosed. How many people, for example, have found to their cost
that the endowment policies which they have taken out to secure repayment
of their mortgages have little or no surrender value in the policy's
early years because the premiums have gone towards the payment of the
salesman's commission?
Nevertheless, many clients are still confused about how much they will
be charged by their solicitor for a given piece of work and it has to
be said that they often are right to be confused. The golden rule if
you are not sure is to ask. It is surprising how many clients
do not ask. Although the precise basis on which a client is to be charged
should be given in writing at the outset this sometimes does not happen
and clients rightly feel aggrieved if they are ambushed by an unexpectedly
large bill at the end. Always ask on what basis you will be charged
and be sure to ask if there is anything about it which is unclear.
In some cases, (buying or selling a house or
flat is the most common) a solicitor will agree a fixed fee in advance
and this usually presents few problems.The cost
of obtaining a divorce is normally another such example. However,
even in this case it is sensible to be quite clear about what is and
what is not included in the fixed fee. So called "disbursements"
usually are not included. In most cases this simply means costs such
as Land Registry fees, local search fees etc which the solicitor has
to pay to third parties on behalf of the client and for which he will
seek to be re-imbursed. These do not usually cause a problem and they
will be the same from solicitor to solicitor. However, there are still
some solicitors who charge for such things as photocopying or postage
etc under this heading and it is as well to be aware of it.
Incidentally, it is also worth while bearing in mind that you should
choose horses for courses. It would be silly to pay a partner in a large
City of London firm to buy or sell your house (even if he were prepared
to do it) because the cost would be quite disproportionate. A High Street
solicitor will usually be much more competitive for this type of work.
Conversely, if you need specialist advice on, say, corporate demergers
you will almost certainly need to engage a specialist or specialists
and pay correspondingly more for it.
What is probably less well realised is that even within quite small
firms there can be a range of charging levels depending on the person
who is dealing with your work. Typically, this will range from a partner
at the top end of the scale through to an assistant solicitor or perhaps
a legal executive in the middle to a legal clerk at the bottom. It is
always worth asking if a firm has different charging levels depending
on who carries out the work and to consider whether the work you want
done can be done more economically and effectively by, say, a legal
executive as opposed to a partner.
For work which is not carried out on a fixed fee basis, (litigation
is generally one such example because it cannot usually be foreseen
how long a given case might last), solicitors normally charge for each
in-coming and out-going letter, for telephone calls and for time otherwise
spent (for example, interviewing the client, drafting documents etc).
These charges vary quite considerably from solicitor to solicitor and
it is vitally important that the client understands them in order to
make best use of his solicitor's time and to keep some control over
costs. For an example of how this works (and how the costs are calculated
is by no means self-evident unless you choose to ask) take a look at
an old example of the Legal Aid Board's scale
of costs applicable in Family Matters. (It is worth mentioning that
this is not in fact the current scale and the figures are used for illustration
purposes only). Understanding how this works will give you an idea of
how solicitors' charges as calculated (and why they sometimes seem to
be more than the client had expected).
It is quite possible to ask to be informed if costs exceed a given
point. Sometimes, too, it may be possible for the client to act in person
for some matters and only to seek specific legal advice as and when
he needs it.
In the event that you are unhappy with your solicitor's bill you should
in the first instance take it up with your solicitor. He is obliged
to give you a detailed breakdown of how the bill is made up and this
may be sufficient to resolve matters.
If it is not, you do have the right to have the bill scrutinised by
a third party and the result of that may be that the size of the bill
is reduced. Your solicitor will explain the procedures by which you
may do this. In the case of contentious issues (that is, those involving
court proceedings) the process usually adopted is called "assessment"
and in the case of non-contentious matters the client may have a right
to obtain an adjudication from the Law Society confirming that the bill
is fair and reasonable or otherwise. It has to be said that there is
a cost to both procedures and who will pay those costs rather depends
on whether the original bill was deemed fair and reasonable or not but
it is certainly the case that there are procedures by which a solicitor's
bill can be questioned. It is usually better, though, to make quite
sure where you stand at the outset and agree a proper framework of how
you will be charged.
There is no reason why solicitors' charges should be a subject of
such mystery but the truth of the matter is that they often are. Understanding
them is vital if a client wants to make the best use of his solicitor's
time and if the solicitor/client relationship is to be built on a firm
foundation. There is no long term benefit to either solicitor or client
if at the end of a given piece of work the client is left feeling dissatisfied
because of the costs. It is in both the solicitor's interest and that
of his client that solicitors' charges are fair, reasonable, comprehensible
and (in the last resort) subject to independent review.